Category: The Left

In November of 2007, Mrs. Clinton was asked about her position regaridng the anti-American disloyal marxist sellout Eliot Spitzer handing drivers licenses to ileagal imigrants for the purpose of voter fraud in the State of New York. Hillary Clinton stated she thought it was a good idea. Then when asked to confirm her position she said the moderator was trying to play a game of 'gotcha'.

In this moment of slipping and being herself, this dumb dumb has unwittingly created a capaign 'sticking' issue that will haunt her. She is grossly on the wrong side of this issue according to the leagal populations wants - no driver licenses to ileagals..

You hear all the talk about "undocumented workers". A riddle for you, what is a bigger threat to our nation than "undocumented workers"? The answer, "half documented workers".

So like other canidates refused to answer personal questions such as infidelity in a marrage, now she may do the same about answering any questions regarding her position on ileagal imigrants drivers licenses, as it is a personal issue and she wont involve herself in 'gotcha politics', or, pressing to figure out where the hell she really stands on an important issue... meaning, she's on the wrong side so pressing her hurts her, equates to gotcha.

This will further confirm her belief that it is better to lie because these dumb ass voters dont know what's good for them.

Ask me what I feel about the issue, press me like a grape, squeeze me as hard a you can, I want you to...its because I have nothing to hide, I believe what I believe and I am proud of it. My convictions are a SELLING POINT. So gotcha means pressing on an issue that your on the wrong side of, an issue your trying to hide from. So get to the truth of a presidential canidate's actual position and its 'gotcha', what a liar. Keep in mind she has also exposed that voter fraud for her party is more important than the public good, and she also showed her willingness to lie about the reason drivers licenses are "a good idea".

The New York Times 'reported' on the debate and called it a "withering attack". "withering attack"? Brutally bludgeoned, a horrific and mccobb massacre, a blood bath of epic propertions, a grizzly and violent assault.

For terrorist blowing up civilians, they are freedom fighters seeking their rights, it is 'differing insterests'.

Has the 'differences of opinons' against bush, a liar, war criminal, intentional killing of civilians, war for his rich friends, torturer, should be impeached...has that ever been described as a "withering attack"?

Do you remember when Bill Clintons second election run, after he was caught fondling the intern babysitter on government property. Where was the 'Separation of Sin and State'? The media framed the campaign contest as "are the Republicans going to 'go negative?", "are they 'going negative". But, with Bush, its not 'going negative' when the Democrats accuse him of war crimes in a time of war.

The media will help to dismantle the Clinton iron dike persona by shielding this babe in the woods from naughty men, how shall this withering flower stand agaisnt terrorists and the Chicoms?

So which is it? It's both. From the media who 'cares about the children' and is also militantly for abortion on demand.



Incredible paranoia by the media, paceing rats trying to outflank Clintons Chavez-ESQ dillusions. In issues of womanhood for strength, she can crush even brass balls with a godess finess, but when this social program pumping lesbian is so much as breathed on...chivalry is back in style suddenly, even for a butch.

The New York Times used these words to describe the conduct of the debates as it related to poor Mrs. Clinton, who in word pictures is curled in the fetal position on a cold wet concrete floor begging for mercy: "strikingly different in tone; parrying criticism from every corner of the stage; vulnerabilities that come from being a high-visibility candidate; attacked; challenged; assailed; tense and combative; target of attacks; surprised by the intensity; assailing her constantly; attacks; line of attack".

I dont agree with Mrs. Clintons politics, but I am sorry that she was repeatedly gang raped in a Guatemalan prison...hey, wait, this article was describing a debate she was in. Their is more adjectives in this article that two days of Court TV, the perverted red diaper false god worshiping zeolettes in the media, Clintons their gal...the Miss Marxist 2008 Idolatry Queen, forget womanhood, forget homecomming queen, this is about the propulsion of darkness and the propagandists are playing both sides of the fence.

"Here, lemmie me get that door for ya Miss Clinton mam, why, I sure would like to assist you in crossing the street Miss Clinton mam", and, "this bitch is as tough as nails and she'll crush the balls of the terrorists if need be".

I guess this battle ground will make the real worlds problems seem very simple when war tested Mrs. Clinton takes the healm of the most powerfull nation on planet earth. After all, the debate she survived, who could question her fortitude?

So I guess the campaign slogan is - 'hold the door open for butch dikes'

Their trickery is going to make her look weak in a time of war, in a time of terror, poor little miss Clinton, she's nice but we dont want to burden her with this difficult job of the presidency. What an abomniation our media.



Look at the lives these people have lead, it is sad and hollow. They have been on the wrong path.

Maxism is the antithesis of a Christian society. And they have packaged their positions in such a way that the normal run of the mill uninformed and undereducated masses of airheads in this country bite on the bit.

Thery also attract the out-and-out rebelion against God - homosexuals, woman's "liberation" advocates, people with their hand out, and those who are simply to high-minded for the crusty and dusty Holy Bible.

Maxisism is simply the counter-Christ's answer. The ones that are smarter than God, the ones who crave power and other earthly indulgences, answer to the way a society should be run. Godless and man-made principles. Instead of the way God himself has proposed we prosper.

Instead of saying "we are the anti-God alternative", proponents of marxism simply market their positions as the caring choice, the feel good way, the compasionate way...they appeal to the flesh and not the spirit.

Thats why Clinton and the Left cannot talk openly about what they believe. Homosexuality, abortion, and wlefare. What they promote is the exact opposite of the Bible.