Category: The Left

Hi, my name is Grumps. I am a new aborted fetus puppet character on Sesame Street. I live in a trash dumpster, sorta like Oscar the grouch who lives in the trash can. But mine is behind the clinic.

I'm pink and sorta curled up, but I'm still cute and fuzzy. I pop my head out (no pun intended) and talk to other characters walking by.

I think that you should vote for the Democrat party, they are the ones who gave my mother the right to terminate me. I know my mother ended up changing her mind because her and her boyfriend (my father) broke up. There are some that wouldn't have allowed her to terminate me this late. But I'm glad my mom didn't have to suffer.

Yeah, it did hurt pretty bad, but it was over pretty quickly, and if I was born that would have caused my mother a very long time of being responsible for me.

Also, Democrats want to use my body for science, I think that is a great idea as a way to give my short life meaning. But some mean people don't want my body to be able to be used for any research at all.

I guess you could say I am pro-abortion. A lot of people are fighting to get rid of abortion, I say its none of their business what happens to me inside my mothers womb. If you allow people to control what happens to me in the womb then they'll want to control how I live outside of the womb as well. It's nobodies business the choices my mother makes.

So called Conservative politicians don't care about women or children at all. They want to control women, and, some kids might have been helped if my body was allowed to be used in science. Who knows, maybe some disease that kids suffer with might have been cured if my body was allowed to be used as science...now you tell me who cares about kids more. They care about their unyielding ideology more that they do actually helping people.

The Democrat party cares about children. They want to help kids by giving their mother's money to raise them. They want to pay for all the things needed to be a mother, food, housing, medical care, schools. They don't try to force women to do things for themselves. And, they are in favor of a mother aborting her child if she feels she might not be able to raise it in the best of circumstances, saving the child from what could have been a bad life.

I think it is fair for me to have been aborted. My mother was not ready to have me. If I was born who knows how I would have been raised, or how I would have turned out. One thing for sure is it was not the best time for my mother to be a long term mother. This is the best scenario under the circumstances.

Anti-abortion activists should leave my mother alone. Half these people are men and don't even understand the hell my mother or any other mother has to go through making this decision. Hypocrites.

Women should make this decision and not politicians. After all, women have already lived in this world and are already established. They are adult humans and are way more advanced than a fetus. The womans standard of life should be protected. Her life is a known commodity, a bird-in-the-hand. I was arriving on the scene far into her life. She already knows what she wants and doesn't want...only she is the one who knows what will make her happier.

I can guarantee you that every fetus wants their mother to be happy. It was my mom that provided life to me. I ate the same food and water that she did. Without her I could not have lived at all.

So leave her alone.

The Democrat party is the one that will protect my mother's rights. And all mothers rights. They are the ones that care about women. And they are the ones that care about children as well. The Democrat party offers more rights to children, they are advocates for children. A vote for the Democrat party is a vote for children.

Conservatives are against children. And they are against mother's rights. They don't want mothers to have a chance and they don't want children to have a chance either. They are cruel.

If you value the rights of woman and you value the care of living children then please join with me together for the Democrat party. Its time to put the haters in their place.

Category: The Left



Below is an article written by: [further down is my rebuttal]
News/Current Events Opinion (Published)
Keywords: CLINTON ALINSKY
Author: Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky Courtesy the Wanderer
Posted on 03/23/2000 16:22:25 PST by Slyfox

Saul Alinsky wrote two books outlining his organizational principles and strategies: Reveille for Radicals (1946) and Rules for Radicals (1971).

Rules for Radicals opens with a quote about Lucifer, written by Saul Alinsky: "Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins -- or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom -- Lucifer."

In Rules for Radicals, Alinsky says: "Here I propose to present an arrangement of certain facts and general concepts of change, a step toward a science of revolution." He builds on the tactical principles of Machiavelli: "The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-nots on how to take it away."

Rules for Radicals is concerned with the acquisition of power: "my aim here is to suggest how to organize for power: how to get it and how ot use it." This is not to be done with assistance to the poor, nor even by organizing the poor to demand assistance: "...[E]ven if all the low-income parts of our population were organized ... it would not be powerful enough to get significant, basic, needed changes."

Alinsky advises the organizer to target the middle class, rather than the poor: "Organization for action will now and in the decade ahead center upon America's white middle class. That is where the power is."

Alinsky is interested in the middle class solely for its usefulness: "Our rebels have contemptuously rejected the values and the way of life of the middle class. They have stigmatized it as materialistic, decadent, bourgeois, degenerate, imperialistic, war-mongering, brutalized and corrupt. They are right; but we must begin from where we are if we are to build power for change, and the power and the people are in the middle class majority."

To accomplish this, Alinsky writes that the organizer must "begin to dissect and examine that way of life [the middle class lifestyle] ... He will know that 'square' is no longer to be dismissed as such -- instead his own approach must be 'square' enough to get the action started."

Rules for Radicals defends belief that the end justifies the means: "to say that corrupt the ends," writes Alinsky, "is to believe in the immaculate conception of ends and principles ... the practical revolutionary will understand ... [that] in action, one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent both with one's individual conscience and the good of mankind."

Altogether, Alinsky provides eleven rules of the ethics of means and ends. They are morally relativistic:

"The practical revolutionary will understand Goethe's 'conscience is the virtue of observers and not of agents of action'; in action, one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent both with one's individual conscience and the good of mankind."

"The second rule of the ethics of the means and ends is that the judgment of the ethics of means is dependent on the political position of those sitting in judgment." Alinsky elaborates his meaning on this point, saying that if you were a member of the underground Resistance, "... then you adopted the means of assassination, terror, property destruction, the bombing of tunnels and trains, kidnapping, and the willingness to sacrifice innocent hostages to the end of defeating the Nazi's. Those who opposed the Nazi's conquerors regarded the Resistance as a secret army of selfless, patriotic idealists ...." Rules for Radicals is therefore concerned with how to win. "...[I]n such a conflict, neither protagonist is concerned with any value except victory."

"The third rule of the ethics of means and ends is that in war the ends justifies almost any means."

"There can be no such thing as a successful traitor, for if one succeeds, he becomes a founding father."

Rules for Radicals teaches the organizer that he must give a moral appearance (as opposed to behaving morally): "All effective action requires the passport of morality."

The tenth rule of the ethics of means and ends states "that you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral arguments ... Moral rationalization is indispensable at all times of action whether to justify the selection or the use of ends or means."

Rules for Radicals provides the organizer with a tactical style for community organization that assumes an adversarial relationship between groups of people in which one either dominates or is dominated.

"The first rule of power tactics is: power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have."

"Wherever possible go outside the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat."

"Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this. They can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity."

Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also, it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."

"The threat is generally more terrifying than the thing itself."

"In a fight almost anything goes. It almost reaches the point where you stop to apologize if a chance blow lands above the belt."

"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."

One of the criteria for picking the target is the target's vulnerability ... the other important point in the choosing of a target is that it must be a personification, not something general and abstract."

"The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength."

Saul Alinsky urged the active and deliberate "conscious-raising" of people through the technique of "popular education." Popular education is a method by which an organizer leads people to a class-based interpretation of their grievances, and to accept the organizer's systemic solutions to address those grievances. "Through the People's Organization these groups [of citizens] discover that what they considered primarily their individual problem is also the problem of others, and furthermore the only hope for solving an issue of titanic proportions is by pooling all their efforts and strengths. That appreciation and conclusion is an educational process."

Rules for Radicals stresses organizational power-collecting: "The ego of the organizer is stronger and more monumental than the ego of the leader. The organizer is in a true sense reaching for the highest level for which a man can reach -- to create, to be a 'great creator', to play God." Alinsky considered Hillary a terrific "organizer" and wanted her to become his protege. She declined. She had bigger fish to fry. She learned her lessons well. She and Bill have employed Alinsky's tactics probably better than anyone else.

-----------------------------------------------

Below is my response to the above article:

That opening quote is illuminating, but omits Revelations 20:10 which describes the permanent fall of Lucifer's temporary so-called kingdom, however, with the Left's desires - homosexuality, abortion, immorality, no moral rules...its doesn't surprise me that the hierarchy is Obama, Saul Alinsky, then Lucifer.

This Saul Alinsky manifesto represents a demonic religion with Lucifer as its head, and Obama attends this church along with reverend Wright...good thing we have the assurance that God will destroy the plans of the wicked.

Interesting, they are blind and accuse others to be what they are: "materialistic, decadent, bourgeois, degenerate, imperialistic, war-mongering, brutalized and corrupt"

This statement is complete cunning by the devil: "one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent both with one's individual conscience and the good of mankind."

If you are filled with the Holy Spirit as it is made possible through the resurrection of Jesus, the 'conscience and the good of mankind' is ALWAYS congruent.

Lies and accusation are the devils daily bread.

The devil incites this - "assassination, terror, property destruction, the bombing of tunnels and trains, kidnapping".

This is the devils main tactic in this world second to none: "Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this. They can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity." (the Jews tried to do the same thing to Jesus, now Alinsky is trying to claim this as his new and fresh tactic...the devil has no new tricks - same old crap retold in a deferent way).

Alinsky is another Marx type who has rejected God and through the assistance of the devil has sought to create his own god where he as the individual is the ruler and master...the original sin.

This is a deep level of wickedness: "organizer leads people to a class-based interpretation of their grievances, and to accept the organizer's systemic solutions to address those grievances. "Through the People's Organization these groups [of citizens] discover that what they considered primarily their individual problem is also the problem of others, and furthermore the only hope for solving an issue of titanic proportions is by pooling all their efforts and strengths"

people are Gods creation, yet Alinsky views them as his own flock...I guess what he said in this opening statement has come full circle - "he at least won his own kingdom -- Lucifer."

"the highest level for which a man can reach -- to create, to be a 'great creator', to play God." - again, the devils fragility knowing that he can never compete with God - a constant source of insecurity to the devil, the devil has never created one thing - only tells lies in whispers.

Revelation 20:10
Then the devil who had led them astray [deceiving and seducing them] was hurled into the fiery lake of burning brimstone, where the beast and false prophet were; and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever (through the ages of the ages).

Category: The Left



Obama strategy:

huge voter fraud in black inner cities in swing states, if you accuse them of this, they'll just hide behind the race card with their mainstream media backing them up.

Population centers, such as the Cleveland area in swing State Ohio, the
Chicago machine is focusing all their efforts in these city/urban areas which are all cool aid drinking solcialist waiting for a handout anyway, so the incentive for fraud at all levels is direct.

If this gets tangled up in the courts, most jurisdictions in question are communist judges seeking remedy to injustices and they will favor the nonwhites.

Also, the Democrat socialist party will cry racism while using the media
as their bull horn, and the Democrat socialist party will threaten Rodney
King style riots if anyone tries to uncover the vote fraud.

The media is basically running the politics in America, and much of the American population is to stupid and brainwashed to realize what is really happening.

Acorn is to the Democrat party what Al Qaeda is to Iran, an offshoot military wing kept at arms length for PR reasons. Smoke and mirrors, fraud. The Democrats are morally bankrupt, what to you expect from the anti-God party?

What is at stake is bigger government looking to control your life and
distribute equally everybody money no matter how hard anyone works or inovates, or doesn't work or inovate.

Their model is, America is survival of the fittest - it is an equal playing field, but some aren't able to compete as well as others or they simply don't feel like competing. The left views this as an injustice they need to control. The Left hates achievement...its because they cant achieve anything outside of politics and acedemia and they know it. They are incompetent ego centric control freaks.

Loosers, high school presidents. Over achieving where their achievements equal awards and recognition, and fame, and education degrees...but nothing that amounts to one damn thing.

Just like Obama. The community organizer. He couldn't run a Subway sandwhich shop. Anything that includes anything other than just talking he has never done.

In the last century, over a one-hundred year span, the most murder on this planet, even more intentional deaths than all wars between States combined, is Leftist governments against its own citizens. This is basic history.

Yet, how many cheerleaders for the left in States like Ohio, and New York, and Pennsylvania? Cheering on big government and greater government control.

Just try to have a conversation with a Democratic supporter. There mind is closed off completely to facts. They are idiots, or knowingly ignore facts for a secret emotional reason.

The Democratic party and the media are exact in every way to the beginning of the the Nazi regime, Castro regime, and the Hugo Chavez Regime.

As a matter of fact, the Democratic party supports the violent Hugo Chavez and Castro Regimes. Infact, Jimmy Carter, aka 'the worst president ever', helped install the Hugo Chavez regime.

I have talked to people in Ohio who were card carrying members of the Democratic party. They act as unpaid walking PR firms for large government. If you present facts to them that reflect that big government has failed in every single instance in the history of mankind and proceed to cite specific examples, their face goes blank and they begin to repeat basic propaganda.

In other words, they don't want to explore information but have found a comfortable home in this self-made fake world that involves no reality but a whimsical imaginary world minus the unicorns.

This is the downfall or our country. Uninformed idiots that listen to the likes of Chris Mathews and Keith Oberman as though they were television prophets. And the crusty retired morons that parrot things like "I was born a Democrat and I'm gonna die a democrat!" - even though that same person disagrees with welfare, abortion, and homosexual marriage.

Any country where the population wants their neighbors property, and votes themselves permission to take by force their neighbors property...is doomed to failure.

This is exactly what the Democratic party does by way of class envy and income redistribution. Not only is it ethically and morally wrong, the people who support this have no class.