Category: The Left
Posted: 2008-01-14 00:00
Barack Obama in a church on a campaign trial January 13th, 2008. He was speaking to the church form the pulpit. He was talking noticeably more slang to the all or mostly black church similar to Bill Clinton's multiple personality transformations.
He brought up Moses and Joshua of the Old Testament. Then he went on to compare the black civil rights figures to Moses and Joshua. Remember, Moses led the 'slaves'?
Moses and Joshua were combating the will of the Devil on behalf of God. The key word is Devil.
Then he also placed himself figuratively as receiving the 'torch' from the supposed Moses and Joshua-like civil rights leaders of the 1960's.
So, the civil rights figures of the 1960's began to lead blacks out of slavery. Now it is bestowed upon Barack Obama to continue to lead blacks further out of slavery.
By the way, Barack had no black family members here in America during slavery, his American born mother is white and his black father is from Africa. (PS - why are we talking about slavery of more than a century ago when we have a candidate who claims he is going to lead us forward?).
He went on to tell the parishioners that he needs their help in this. And they don't have it
as bad as those civil rights leaders form the 1960's because they don't have to suffer the dogs, the fire hoses, the billy clubs.
What is he talking about? He is a contender for the highest office in our country aided by Oprah the self made billionaire which could only happen in America.
Now the culture of victim is saying the same old crap over and over and over again complaining and making every excuse in the book blaming America first.
How with a straight face can you claim America is this racist abuse machine which covets all the precious cargo which is anything darker than white while at the same time you are bidding for the highest office in the land while at the same time being black?
This is nuts. This is a culture that gets-off on vilifying others and making excuses as if the main thing minorities have in common is that they are all hunkered down victims in life.
This is leadership?
This 'we're commin to get you' talk is not going to fly with the mainstream American voters who are working their tails off to support their family while Barack postulates from a pulpit of a black church annunciating how white people suck.
It is offensive and even defies common sense. I find it audacious.
All his so called mega powerful speeches are spliced down the middle. He is the "All in the Family" television show of the 1970's, he speaks to two audiences at once.
On the one hand Archie Bunker made 'sophisticates' laugh because he represented a mocking of stupid God fearing working white men. And, blue collar guys related to what Archie was saying.
The entertainment connected to two succinctly different demographics.
Obama is the same way. If you listen carefully to his messages, about change, hope, a new day, we can make a way...he is speaking to the working middle and upper class who are sick of politics and sick of politicians. They think he is referring to what they want as far as a refurbished political tone, a new way of governing with a new demeanor and tenor.
Also, his messages, about change, hope, a new day, we can make a way...he is cleverly providing many occupants of the black population civil rights talk of the 1960's.
His speech writers and campaign managers are skillfully playing to both audiences and dishing out tones and images to each group like fish to captive seals.
The main group that would be responsible for voting-in Obama would be white Americans.
What the working class may not be aware of is that Barack is deftly playing the class warfare game and heavily favors income redistribution.
The upper class that connects with him do not care that Barack favors income redistribution. They are Lefties who like Liberal policies and the fact that Barack is black is a bonus because it makes them feel good about themselves.
Much of the media is backing Barack because they want at least some figure head grand statement 'cash in your poker chips' form the civil rights past era. Leftists are still living in the 1960's and they want to display to the world and to themselves how important they are. Electing Barack Obama verifies all their 'hard work'.
Mrs. Clinton gave the Obama camp the gift of even daring of speaking about anything remotely related to race - the Dr. Martin Luther King flack. The Obama camp took it and ran with it, not Barack himself, but his camp. This went on for days.
Fifty percent of Democrat voters in South Carolina are black and the flack 'interestingly' took place right before the South Carolina Democratic primary.
Once the damage was done using the race card Obama came out...after days of the stink...and took the pure as driven snow high road decrying the need to move beyond this tit-for-tat.
In effect he needed to turn the spicket down as not to damage his national poll numbers among whites. While he already received what he wanted via the race-card locally in South Carolina. Sleaze.
Leading us out of a situation he helped to create? Sounds like a politician.
This was not a clumsy use of the race card but a deft, black belt, slight of hand without disrupting the crease in ones dress slacks use of the race card.
This is moving forward? A new day? Change? This is the same old crap form the 1960's only disguised in denial and a soothing tone forgoing the angry confrontational use of the race card of yesteryear.
This is not your fathers race card...
Regarding Michelle Obama comments while Barack was seated at her side in a 60 minutes interview where she stated "as a black man, Barack can get shot just goin' to the gas station."
This is very true, however, statistically, as long as the gas station is not in a black inner city Barack should be just fine.
The overwhelmingly vast majority of violence and murder of blacks in this country is committed by other blacks.
I find her comments disgusting and a view into her paranoid madness that she lives with day to day and probably infects her kids with.
No wonder they go to a segregationist church. It sounds like they are afraid of white folks shooting at them. Racists? Or delusional? You decide.
So Michelle Obama should have qualified her statement to reflect like this: "as a black man, Barack can get shot just goin' to the gas station...and most likely if he is in a black neighborhood."
And I suppose violence in the black inner cities is the greater societies fault as well according to the Obamas.
Hypocritical blame game. These people are throw-backs to the era of segregation yet they claim to be futuristic and cutting edge.
What does this have to do with policy? Nothing. Policy is squarely missing form all the primaries by the democrats. Incredibly so.
First, it is Hilary, is she robotic, is she crying, is she avoiding the press, "now your playing gotcha". 'Are they treating her that way because she is a woman?', 'would people ever elect a woman president - have we progressed far enough for that to happen?', 'does her husband help her or hurt her?'.
Then with Barack it is 'was that a racist comment?', 'was this a racist comment?', 'would they have said that if he wasn't black?', 'don't you think it would good a good form of validification to the minorities in this country who have been shut out if we elected a black president?', 'it would be good statement for the rest of the world about who we are as a people and how far we have come if we elected Barack Obama'.
Give me a break. These baby boomers are so immature it is pathetic. They refuse to adapt to the current day. Everyhting is stylistic and victim.
Liberal politicians and 'journalists' protect Barack Obama with a personal vigor because it is in fact very personal to them.
They view black people as their children. And if anyone picks on your kids - come on, nothing is more personal.
Liberals are the parents. They garner themselves with a parental role towards the black community.
They offer them welfare and all manner of social programs to 'take care of them'. Liberals have an emotional investment in the black community. They want to make sure they are 'ok'. Sort of coming out and checking on them as they sleep, pulling the blanket up just a little higher.
Having tried to influence the greater society to cater to their specific needs their entire professional life - failure at this point would be a 'personal' failure. Much passion and time they have poured into raising the black community from infancy.
Like sending your kid off to school. Make sure he has his lunch packed, "call me if you need anything". And anxiously help them onto the bus hoping they will be ok.
Then finally they get to watch Barak Obama at the 'graduation day' of the black population. On stage representing the black population accepting his diploma figuratively by running for president in his tassel'd hat.
The parents are so proud of their child's accomplishment, wiping a tear from their eye, they marvel and think to themselves that it has all been worth it. All the trials and hardships and their child has finally made it through his difficult teenage years.
Now the parents, Liberals, can sort of sit back and rest knowing that they have done good. But there will always be that little bit of worry that comes along with being a parent.
Yet Liberals are the ones who claim that non-Liberals are the "racists". Perhaps its Liberals who use the black community to keep themselves feeling good while the black community remains disproportionately dependant.
I don't think adults need parents. Other adults simply aren't superior.
Then John Edwards rolls out medical victim after medical victim. Would someone please tell him he is not in a courtroom. What an ambulance chaser. Disgusting. He lives in a thirty thousand square foot home going around telling people how bad America sucks and how unfair it is, and how the rich are keeping all the money for themselves.
He seems to elude to some secret room where the rich have held bags and bags of money for themselves and through John Edwards we can find that room and take away those bags of money and he will share it with all the people.
He fails to represent that businesses are owned via stocks by Jill and Joe sick-pack who have worked down at the factory for thrity years saving their retirement money in stocks. Now the ultra caring Robin Hood John Edwards is going to come and punish that business and take money away form them to redistribute it to people who either haven't worked or haven't saved or both. John Edwards attacks that businesses' profits, the stock goes down, Jill and Joe sick-pack's retirement money goes down. And now Jill and Joe sick-pack are the ones hurting now turning to John Edwards for a hand out.
Take money form the people to the federal government...this is the Left. They want to control your lives. Edwards so far is the only one who is admitting this via his blame game class envy and court room displays and stunts.
Edwards dumps loads on the public daily about how he is from a poor family. What government program has John or his dad ever benefited from? Because if his dad was a poor schlub, a disgusting, filthy, grotesque, gastly, bulging beastly mill worker, and now his son has a thirty thousand square foot home and neither of them used government programs...do we really need government programs?
Oh, yeah, right, I forgot, not everyone is as smart as John Edwards. Or as smart and as female as Hilary. Or as articulate and as black as Barack...grow up.
The bigger story is there is a split in the Democratic party. The Sorros/Howard Dean wing want the Clintons out because the Clintons have been to powerful and influential within the Democratic party.
Plus - they aren't Marxist enough for the players in the party hence the internal warfare within the party...remember Welfare Reform and all the other conservative ideas Clinton co-opted to save his hide? Or how Hillary says she WON'T bring the troops home right away.
Not the Amerika the socialists envision within their life time...
That is why you see all this cannibalization of the Clintons, the power brokers within the Democratic party are turning against the Clintons.
Obama is ultra liberal in all areas. Forget about the lies that flow form his lips. He is a socialist. And, thats what the king makers within the Democratic party and the king makers in the main stream Carl Marx media want.
Not only that, the fact that Obama is black makes the Liberals loose control of their bladders with explosive star struck glee.
The Democrats are trying to build their future around the face of Obama. In other words they think he is their meal ticket to B.S. the public. A smiling vehicle for Marxism.
The conclusion is that you are a 'racist' neandertal if you don't vote for Obama. Remember the conclusion about Hilary's victory in New Hampshire - voters were racist because they didn't vote for Obama, but just the opposite protection was granted Obama in South Carolina - Obama did not win due to race.
We are witnessing a socialistic informational orgy by confused hippies from the 1960's as well as idealistic emotionally led nincompoops filled with either guilt or fantasy, or hatred.